Bucher Medal Committee

CHAIR

Joann Stock, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

MEMBERS

Oliver Jagoutz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Stephane Rondenay, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Blaire Schoene, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
John Valley, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

STAFF LIAISON

Leah Bland

AGU’s Honors Program aligns with AGU’s mission, vision, core values and strategic plan. Established in 1966, the Bucher Medal is given in even-numbered years to one honoree for original contributions to the basic knowledge of crust and lithosphere of Earth and/or other planetary bodies.

COMMITTEE CHARGE

The committee is charged with selecting the recipient of the Bucher Medal. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by the Union. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education and outreach. The members of the Bucher Medal Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and commitment to equity so that the Bucher Medal is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

KEY INITIATIVES FOR 2017-2018

  • Select the Bucher medalist.
  • Review data from Bucher Medal selection processes for the past years to determine if the program is operating maximally in terms of the relevant goals of the Union’s strategic plan.
  • Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of AGU Bucher Medal nominations is sufficiently high for vigorous competition.
  • Recommend and implement strategies and initiatives on diversity and evaluate processes that are currently being implemented to increase nominations.
  • Partner with AGU leaders, staff and other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ rewards and recognition programs.
  • Participate in training, orientations and workshops conducted by the Honors and Recognition Committee to be fully informed of policies, processes and program requirements and guidelines.
  • Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process.
  • Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on policies and processes and program improvements.

TIMELINE AND COMMITMENT

  • The work of this committee is done primarily through the online submission and review system, by telephone conference calls and email.