Kaula Award Committee



Francis Albarede, Ecole Normale Supérieure Lyon, Lyon, France


Eric Barton, Spanish National Research Council, Pontevedra, Span
Arlene Fiore, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA
Olga Khabarova, Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation, Moscow, Russia
James Overland, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, USA
Martha Savage, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Anne Thompson, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
Ray Wells, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, USA


Leah Bland

AGU’s Honors Program aligns with AGU’s mission, vision, core values and strategic plan. The William Kaula Award is given on alternate even numbered years to one honoree for unselfish service to the scientific community through extraordinary dedication to, and exceptional efforts on behalf of, the Union’s publication program.


The committee is charged with selecting the recipient of the William Kaula Award. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by the Union. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education and outreach. The members of the William Award Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and commitment to equity so that the William Award is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

Key Initiatives for 2017-2018

  • Select the William Kaula Award recipient.
  • Review data from William Kaula Award selection processes for the past years to determine if the program is operating maximally in terms of the relevant goals of the Union’s strategic plan.
  • Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of AGU Kaula Award nominations is sufficiently high for vigorous competition.
  • Recommend and implement strategies and initiatives on diversity and evaluate processes that are currently being implemented to increase nominations.
  • Partner with AGU leaders, staff and other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ rewards and recognition programs.
  • Participate in training, orientations and workshops conducted by the Honors and Recognition Committee to be fully informed of policies, processes and program requirements and guidelines.
  • Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process.
  • Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on policies and processes and program improvements.

Timeline and Commitment

  • The work of this committee is done primarily through the online submission and review system, by telephone conference calls and email.