Excellence in Geophysical Education (EGEA)

CHAIR

Kim Kastens, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA

MEMBERS

Barbara Bruno, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
George Hornberger, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Aisha Morris, UNAVCO, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Yuming Wang, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China

STAFF LIAISON

Beth Paredes

AGU’s Honors Program aligns with AGU’s mission, vision, core values and strategic plan. The Education Award is given annually to acknowledge a sustained commitment to excellence in geophysical education by a team, individual, or group.

COMMITTEE CHARGE

The committee is charged with selecting the recipient of the Education Award. Committee members will abide by AGU’s Conflict of Interest Policy, program policies, procedures and guidelines set by the Union. In partnership with the Honors and Recognition Committee and staff, the committee works to ensure that the program is superior in all respects, recognizes all constituents, and fosters a global network of individuals in the Earth and space sciences who epitomize excellence and cooperation in research, education and outreach. The members of the Education Award Committee will promote excellence and transparency, allowing broad input and recognition beyond disciplinary awards, promoting diversity and commitment to equity so that the Education Award is sufficiently representative of underrepresented groups.

KEY INITIATIVES 2017-2018

  • Select the Education Award recipients.
  • Review data from Education Award selection processes for the past years to determine if the program is operating maximally in terms of the relevant goals of the Union’s strategic plan.
  • Examine and report on program data to determine whether the number and quality of AGU Education Award nominations is sufficiently high for vigorous competition.
  • Recommend and implement strategies and initiatives on diversity and evaluate processes that are currently being implemented to increase nominations.
  • Partner with AGU leaders, staff and other societies to resolve common issues among scientific communities’ rewards and recognition programs.
  • Participate in training, orientations and workshops conducted by the Honors and Recognition Committee to be fully informed of policies, processes and program requirements and guidelines.
  • Understand and commit to AGU’s Conflict of Interest policy and process.
  • Provide input and recommendations to the Honors and Recognition Committee on policies and processes and program improvements.

TIMELINE AND COMMITMENT

  • The work of this committee is done primarily through the online submission and review system, by telephone conference calls and email.